Janet Jackson Lingerie Collection

What to do when not dieting? Design your very own lingerie collection. Eventually one that follows your body madness.

You go thin, it shrinks. You go for multilateral expansion, your faithful lingerie expands with you (it was just an idea, I doubt she’s in for something more than money. I’ll leave inventions to people who really care). So the Jacksons go underwear to keep it all under the sheets. Excited about the news?

UPDATE: And so she’s finally launched her Pleasure Principle. Miss Jackson named her lingerie collection after one of her hits songs from the late eighties. Every item of the Chantilly laced lingerie is priced under $40 for everyone to afford and enjoy (and to highly contribute miss’ Jackson bank account). However, the just arrived images are these and the main message of the celeb-designer is comfort and fit. Is it so?

(via wwd)

The Beckhams have done it again! In September we’ll witness the launch of two new perfumes from the power couple.

Signature for Her is fruity floriental, selling for $52-$62 and Signature for Him is fresh woody oriental selling for $50-$60. Meant to mirror the new American life they’re living, buying the Signatures would mean that “You’re getting a piece of David and me with this”. What would life be (ours and theirs) if celebrity would be more than just a name on the market?

(via wwd)

Loosing one, gaining another, there goes life. And what a glamorous and full of friends life!

Sharon was shown the exit door from the Dior China contract and not even a month away she features her gorgeous blond self in another advertising campaign. This time it’s all about jewelry. Italian made, highly expensive and highly appreciated in the Hollywood Hills, Damiani imagined a naturally photoshopped Sharon to represent their sparkling jewelry across the world. How about that? Seems like Italians don’t really care about Dalai Lama or others friends and foes of mighty blond Sharon. Or maybe a month is time enough to forgive and forget her declarations?(click the photo to enlarge)

(photos via ontdff)

If I was to state my preference, it would clearly go for none. And not because of the models (I actually kinda like Jessica) but because they look sooooooooo ugly!

The Mulberry Agyness surpasses the Jacobs Stam. And that’s not a hard thing to do! The Marc Jacobs Stam looks more like a coin purse on a larger scale hanging on a metal chain. The Mulberry Agyness, however, bears no Agyness sign. I would’ve recognized it as such if it had a red sock, a blonde flying fringe, some scary fashion sign, some deliberate outrageousness.. not a white simple bag that I could even push to call classy.. Which one do you choose?

(photos via purseblog, ondff)

Just because I loved Blondie, Debbie Harry as well, I couldn’t get pass this odd picture. Of course I could indulge because I just said I loved her, but ….

I can’t. It’s a mad lack of respect for your fans and the ones who love you even if you’re a gorgeous blond model singing like heaven or a great singer continuing your career even if you’re 63 years old. Is this aesthetically photoshop-right and morally wrong poster giving you the creeps just like it did to me?

(photos via dailymail)

Marc Jacobs is definitely into blogging! By now you’ve all seen at least one of the images from the upcoming Marc by Marc Jacobs Advertising.

Personally, looking at them I sincerely wondered why I suddenly feel nostalgic regarding Victoria Beckham’s ads for Jacobs.. Like running away from some nightmare… You know I have something against Juergen’s photography style, but this time it’s not just that.

Read more…

Do you ever dream about your childhood and all those games you played and how fun it used to be?

I do. And sometimes I wish I’d live it all over again. Now. Live my childhood as an adult. Luckily I have my kids to help get the impossible possible. Oh, those young years! What a bliss!

(photo source)

Longtime ignoring this news has finally caught me. And not because I gave into the charm of the ad’s face or the ad’s brand, but because it was too hilarious to pass.

David Beckham’s Macy’s Union Square Park (California USA) Billboard had a particular unveiling ceremony on June 18. The masses awaited the strip tease (even on a billboard) and they were rewarded with a ridiculous show. Because I’m not one of those falling apart over men’s muscle mass or tattoos, I look at this Emporio Armani ad and repeatedly ask myself why this is causing such a stir. I understand a heavy percentage of women consider him outstandingly beautiful. I understand he was a successful football player (now who’s watching usa soccer games besides Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes to tell what’s become of his talent). I can even understand this Emporio Armani ripping off the success story of Calvin Klein underwear. But for how long? And how far?

(photos via scentedsalamander)