Not long ago, Victoria’s Secret was landing the sexy factor for a more feminine approach of their collections.
When reading those lines, I realized there was not so much sexy behind VS so I made a silent promise to bring you what I considered to be really interesting from that point of view in the lingerie world. Well, today I came across something.. let’s say…subversive. I can’t call it art, I’d just go directly for the unpractical, unwearable, unreasonable. Do you sincerely find a purpose for these lingerie items?
(photos strumpetandpink)
3 comments
[…] lingerie? Is it that gay-myth making men run like chased from some ugly nightmare when talking lace or silk lingerie for men? I may be asking too many questions but that’s because I really want to hear your side of […]
Yes, Burlesque dancing.
I think you could potentially call these examples art. And your right, vs is lame. But these pieces all relate beautifully to the female form, and with no doubt artistically inclined. I would argue art.
Some think art cant be practical. Art is something that the maker has put into the peice besides the craft. These are art, wearable art if you are so brave.
Leave a Comment