While everyone keeps on insisting on a comparison between Lady Gaga and Christina Aguilera, I’m seeing nothing justifying the comparison if not for the fact that they’re both performers.
Trying to match Gaga’s trashyness to Christina’s classyness is just pointless. And GQ Germany June 2010 stands proof with this speechless cover! I may not exactly appreciate getting undressed for a photo shoot, but with Christina it’s always been like that. She’s got a good body and she’s taking advantage of it, showing it to get more attention. Only she does it with class, not like someone who’s walking around with almost nothing on and tons of wigs to express her artsyness. What do you think? Is there anything consistent behind the Gaga-Xtina war? (photo via)
3 comments
Can’t these performers sell their music anymore without these naked poses?
Hmm, for a change I would love to see some hot guys! I’m tired of these so called “classy nude poses”. I don’t mind it, each to to their own, I would buy this GQ for man who loves to look at it. No problem. I just don’t get what this cover has to do with fashion?
It is more of a ‘high fashion’ shot than the usual sexy/’tits out’ men’s mag cover shot.
I think it’s funny describing a pop singer as classy. Xtina, Gaga, Madonna, etc etc…. ‘Classy’ is not the word I’d use to describe any of them. Wanting to show off on stage isn’t classy behaviour, ladies and gents.
The only things that Gaga and Christina have in common is that they are both blonde (sometimes) and that they sing.
I would not say one was classy over the other. As for this cover I don’t find it interesting as art or fashion. She is just getting her face back out there and being naked is a good way for her to get noticed again,
Leave a Comment