Carey Mulligan Covers Vogue US October 2010

  • Pin it

Now I couldn’t have brought you Vogue UK’s Cheryl Cole outrageousness without mentioning Carey Mulligan’s Vogue US October 2010, could I? The two main Vogue editions come out as disappointing for the October 2010 issues. At least in my books.

Two non-fashion ladies (Cheryl Cole and Carey Mulligan both have out – fashion careers and are in no official way related to any fash subjects) deserved a fashion magazine cover for reasons only known by the respective editors in chiefs. Well, maybe Carey has a movie coming up, but I still don’t see why the amazing Grace Coddington styled such a strange looking Lindbergh photographed pictorial.

I would normally like Carey’s fresh short hair and witty face, however, doesn’t oddly look so much older? (click through to see more images and a behind the scenes video; click here for the gallery!) Too bad for the splendid couture dresses! (Vogue via)

Carey Mulligan Vogue US October 2010 cover

Carey Mulligan Vogue US October 2010 Peter Lindbergh

Carey Mulligan Vogue US October 2010

Carey Mulligan Vogue US October 2010 1 Carey Mulligan Vogue US October 2010 2 Carey Mulligan Vogue US October 2010 3

4 comments

#1 Ellington on 09.09.10 at 12:44 pm

She is pretty and talented but as for her being on the cover of Vogue i am not too sure. But then again that seems to be the way Vogue rolls now.

#2 Adriana on 09.10.10 at 6:20 am

Yes, Anna decided celebs are the Vogue cover models. So it be. It won’t be long and they sit not just front row they walk on the catwalk too. I don’t like it. But who am I? Someone who stopped to buy these magazines dear editors. I bet I’m not the only one. But other people have probably replace us since it goes on and on?

Nice talented girl, great shoots but it spoils both my fash and movie fun. :((

Music fun too since I’ve to think about Dior now when I hear Muse……:((((((

#3 mohar rozlan on 09.11.10 at 6:50 am

i so dont enjoy both the us and british edition of vogue .. what are the editors thinking …. its about time anna retired .. i use to look up to her as being so advance in the fashion world .. but now its just another tabloid .. maybe i should just buy hello or the other editions of vogue which have better coverage and also covers …. something is so wrong with the american fashion magazines …

#4 keiko on 09.13.10 at 1:03 am

Every month I think the same thing when I see VOGUE’S cover & that is creativity is dead. It is all the text, the starlet and all of the supposed fabulousness that is making me yawn. I swear the Nat Geos from 1965 in my grandmother’s parlour are more interesting!
After reading how Anna Wintour’s fav cover is the 1989 cover with Micheala Bercu – even she is bored by the notion’s of fashion – if you compare the cover friom 1989 to the last 10 years.

Leave a Comment