Talking about Anja Rubik not long ago and how she would change three times during her wedding (that would mean, in my perspective, three wedding dresses, right?) made me think about this particular wedding dress from Badgley Mischka’s Spring 2012 Bridal Collection.
It’s called Laura and it can be worn three ways. And in my opinion it doesn’t mean it can be considered a different dress each time you attach an accessory to it. With a crystal belt or without crystal belt, the wedding dress is pretty much the same to my eyes. It’s the bolero that may alter something in perspective, heightening the cut a bit. Do you think this qualifies as a three – dresses – in – one? The same goes for the Anastacia gown which you’ll find right after the jump, with a two – dresses – in – one. (it’s not me saying that, as I already stated, I think it’s pretty much the same dress, with or without belt or bolero; however, someone saw three dresses in Laura by Badgley Mischka)
1 comment so far
I have to say that after looking at the pure simplicity and elegance of Kate Middleton’s gown (the Duchess of Cambridge) I find both of these gowns to look rather tacky.
Leave a Comment