Kristen Stewart With And Without Photoshop

  • Pin it

While the main Photoshop controversy title is still held by Demi Moore’s W cover, here’s Kristen Stewart’s Dazed and Confused before the final photo editing maneuver.

She’s not far from her usual self, being young is already in her advantage, however, one must ask: what’s the point of makeup if everything can be done in a digital way? Who needs models, anyway? (ah! I know the answer to that one! Models are stand-up bodies for famous people in need for a silhouette swap when covering an artsy fashion magazine!) (you can rejoice the massive migraine of the switching bodies hypothesis for the cover of W Magazine here; however, before you get carried away in a sea of hate and cast the photo-moral stone, you should also know that there was no such evil thing done and that W cover, even if guilty of tons of airbrushing, cannot be put on stand for the changing-bodies-scam!) (photos via)

Kristen Stewart Dazed Confused 09 no Photoshop

Kristen Stewart Dazed Confused 09 no editing


#1 Adriana on 11.28.09 at 8:05 am

Sighs…..but who can convince me that the “bad looking” one is not photoshopped either? I trust no photo anymore…..sorry….

Are we sure it’s not Demi’s body though? Because she looks very toned on recent red carpet photos. Of course Demi, though in denial, has a lot off work done. The poor Willis daughters look all like dad…..

#2 ME on 12.21.09 at 7:41 pm

Photo shop was very much needed in her case. She looks terrible without it.

#3 cc on 01.24.10 at 8:27 pm

She does not! She’s young and beautiful. Photoshop was not invented for people like her.

Leave a Comment