Kristen Stewart With And Without Photoshop

While the main Photoshop controversy title is still held by Demi Moore’s W cover, here’s Kristen Stewart’s Dazed and Confused before the final photo editing maneuver.

She’s not far from her usual self, being young is already in her advantage, however, one must ask: what’s the point of makeup if everything can be done in a digital way? Who needs models, anyway? (ah! I know the answer to that one! Models are stand-up bodies for famous people in need for a silhouette swap when covering an artsy fashion magazine!) (you can rejoice the massive migraine of the switching bodies hypothesis for the cover of W Magazine here; however, before you get carried away in a sea of hate and cast the photo-moral stone, you should also know that there was no such evil thing done and that W cover, even if guilty of tons of airbrushing, cannot be put on stand for the changing-bodies-scam!) (photos via)

Kristen Stewart Dazed Confused 09 no Photoshop

Kristen Stewart Dazed Confused 09 no editing

RSS
 If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my full RSS feed or maybe you want to receive a daily e-mail with my latest articles.add to google


Search for more:

3 comments

#1 Adriana on 11.28.09 at 8:05 am

Sighs…..but who can convince me that the “bad looking” one is not photoshopped either? I trust no photo anymore…..sorry….

Are we sure it’s not Demi’s body though? Because she looks very toned on recent red carpet photos. Of course Demi, though in denial, has a lot off work done. The poor Willis daughters look all like dad…..

#2 ME on 12.21.09 at 7:41 pm

Photo shop was very much needed in her case. She looks terrible without it.

#3 cc on 01.24.10 at 8:27 pm

She does not! She’s young and beautiful. Photoshop was not invented for people like her.

Leave a Comment