<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kristen Stewart With And Without Photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylefrizz.com/200911/kristen-stewart-with-and-without-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200911/kristen-stewart-with-and-without-photoshop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cc</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200911/kristen-stewart-with-and-without-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-19272</link>
		<dc:creator>cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=17666#comment-19272</guid>
		<description>She does not! She&#039;s young and beautiful. Photoshop was not invented for people like her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She does not! She&#8217;s young and beautiful. Photoshop was not invented for people like her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ME</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200911/kristen-stewart-with-and-without-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-18515</link>
		<dc:creator>ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=17666#comment-18515</guid>
		<description>Photo shop was very much needed in her case. She looks terrible without it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photo shop was very much needed in her case. She looks terrible without it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200911/kristen-stewart-with-and-without-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-17142</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=17666#comment-17142</guid>
		<description>Sighs.....but who can convince me that the &quot;bad looking&quot; one is not photoshopped either? I trust no photo anymore.....sorry....

Are we sure it&#039;s not Demi&#039;s body though? Because she looks very toned on recent red carpet photos. Of course Demi, though in denial, has a lot off work done. The poor Willis daughters look all like dad.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sighs&#8230;..but who can convince me that the &#8220;bad looking&#8221; one is not photoshopped either? I trust no photo anymore&#8230;..sorry&#8230;.</p>
<p>Are we sure it&#8217;s not Demi&#8217;s body though? Because she looks very toned on recent red carpet photos. Of course Demi, though in denial, has a lot off work done. The poor Willis daughters look all like dad&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

