<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leighton Meester&#8217;s US Harper Bazaar September 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylefrizz.com/200908/leighton-meesters-us-harper-bazaar-september-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200908/leighton-meesters-us-harper-bazaar-september-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200908/leighton-meesters-us-harper-bazaar-september-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-14113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=14028#comment-14113</guid>
		<description>Dreadful and lacking in elegance and beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreadful and lacking in elegance and beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200908/leighton-meesters-us-harper-bazaar-september-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-14104</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=14028#comment-14104</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t Susan Boyle on the cover? It seems there&#039;s a photospread inside of her in this Bazaar? Why didn&#039;t they have the guts? And it would sell. People love fairy tales after all. Right? 

Poor thing on photo 4........that collar! Oh, this is for 65/70+ hiding a wrinkle neck? So pic 1 is for a 10/20 something, then pic 2 is for 20/30 somethings, pic 3 40/50 year olds and at last 4 for the elderly? Ah, I see. 
I would rather call this ageless creepy altered beauty. Ugh......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t Susan Boyle on the cover? It seems there&#8217;s a photospread inside of her in this Bazaar? Why didn&#8217;t they have the guts? And it would sell. People love fairy tales after all. Right? </p>
<p>Poor thing on photo 4&#8230;&#8230;..that collar! Oh, this is for 65/70+ hiding a wrinkle neck? So pic 1 is for a 10/20 something, then pic 2 is for 20/30 somethings, pic 3 40/50 year olds and at last 4 for the elderly? Ah, I see.<br />
I would rather call this ageless creepy altered beauty. Ugh&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellington</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200908/leighton-meesters-us-harper-bazaar-september-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-14082</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=14028#comment-14082</guid>
		<description>This is dire. : (
I too have never fallen for Gossip Girl and I never ever will.
The books are reprehensible and the show seems insipid.
I am a tad peeved that she is on the September cover as I usually enjoy the September issue of Harper&#039;s, well no such joy for me this year. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is dire. : (<br />
I too have never fallen for Gossip Girl and I never ever will.<br />
The books are reprehensible and the show seems insipid.<br />
I am a tad peeved that she is on the September cover as I usually enjoy the September issue of Harper&#8217;s, well no such joy for me this year. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daydreamer</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200908/leighton-meesters-us-harper-bazaar-september-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-14069</link>
		<dc:creator>Daydreamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=14028#comment-14069</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really not-so-sure cover, she is cute on the cover and the light is so  Richardson&#039;s but the editorial are bad, they all are strange .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really not-so-sure cover, she is cute on the cover and the light is so  Richardson&#8217;s but the editorial are bad, they all are strange .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

