Pregnant but not showing it. So many women dream about that! But what are we to do with the moral issues of such strange wanting?
We’ll leave it to others. This is fashion, not the moral convention! London Fog’s Ad Campaign Fall Winter 2009 2010 features Gisele Bundchen. Wait, but isn’t she pregnant? She is, but you won’t notice a thing! Nino Munoz’ pictures have been officially photoshopped to bump-out any trace of Gisele’s pregnancy. (the story continues right after the jump with more pictures and a behind the scenes video!)
Unbelievably public, yet never confirmed, Gisele Bundchen’s pregnancy may have been digitally removed from the London Fog ads pictures, but this still is the first official announcement (as official as any third party press release can be) that Gisele is with bébé.
The photoshop job results are pretty natural (I do have some reserves regarding the beige trench picture, but it’s also true I haven’t been paying too much attention to Gisele’s anatomy to see if the digital afterworks are coherent with her natural features. What do you think? Shall we break the moral convention panel and talk about her removing the pregnancy features from the London Fog ad campaign? Is it her personal choice, will leave it to that and stick to fashion? (Dogmatic via J2)