<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natalia Vodianova Covers Vogue UK June 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylefrizz.com/200905/natalia-vodianova-covers-vogue-uk-june-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200905/natalia-vodianova-covers-vogue-uk-june-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellington</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200905/natalia-vodianova-covers-vogue-uk-june-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12304</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=11494#comment-12304</guid>
		<description>I am not a fan of nudity just for the sake of attention grabbing and I think that this cover falls into that category. It looks like a &quot;Maxim&quot; cover actually rather than a fashion magazine cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a fan of nudity just for the sake of attention grabbing and I think that this cover falls into that category. It looks like a &#8220;Maxim&#8221; cover actually rather than a fashion magazine cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Che</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200905/natalia-vodianova-covers-vogue-uk-june-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator>Che</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=11494#comment-12290</guid>
		<description>I agree with, I dont think the nudity was necessary . Bizarrely enough the cover really does remind me of Beth Ditto&#039; LOVE magazine cover</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with, I dont think the nudity was necessary . Bizarrely enough the cover really does remind me of Beth Ditto&#8217; LOVE magazine cover</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200905/natalia-vodianova-covers-vogue-uk-june-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12289</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=11494#comment-12289</guid>
		<description>I agree. Though I think Natalia looks beautiful (as always) this is not about fashion at all. 
Interesting line: &quot;What our bodies reveal&quot;. Well this body reveals nothing. I believe Natalia looks still good after giving birth to three children but this is photoshopped too. 

It was kinda refreshing to see a photos of Julia Roberts au naturel in a bikini, that is if the Daily Mail has not photoshopped her the other way around.....Anyway she looked radiant but it was obvious she has given birth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Though I think Natalia looks beautiful (as always) this is not about fashion at all.<br />
Interesting line: &#8220;What our bodies reveal&#8221;. Well this body reveals nothing. I believe Natalia looks still good after giving birth to three children but this is photoshopped too. </p>
<p>It was kinda refreshing to see a photos of Julia Roberts au naturel in a bikini, that is if the Daily Mail has not photoshopped her the other way around&#8230;..Anyway she looked radiant but it was obvious she has given birth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

