<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sticky And Sweet Faces Of Madonna Vs W Magazine March 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tennelle</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-19652</link>
		<dc:creator>Tennelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=7569#comment-19652</guid>
		<description>Rock On Madonna!! Love IT! These new photos are hotter than the originals in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock On Madonna!! Love IT! These new photos are hotter than the originals in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10002</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=7569#comment-10002</guid>
		<description>Oh please no more fuel on any fire! It was just an example.....not the best one I believe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please no more fuel on any fire! It was just an example&#8230;..not the best one I believe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellington</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=7569#comment-10000</guid>
		<description>Yes I think that we should mention men more often too!
Oh and that W cover with Brad had an article in it with him discussing his marriage ending with Jennifer and his falling in love with Angelina.
More fuel for the fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I think that we should mention men more often too!<br />
Oh and that W cover with Brad had an article in it with him discussing his marriage ending with Jennifer and his falling in love with Angelina.<br />
More fuel for the fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9994</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=7569#comment-9994</guid>
		<description>Alas authenticity isn&#039;t &quot;allowed&quot; anymore. Interesting faces are gone. Is it us the audience who seems not to want authenticity anymore? Is it us who does want only to see beauty fake? Or are we brainwashed by the media? Even a lot off younger big stars are not for real anymore. Most off them have something changed. I&#039;ve viewed a site with the &quot;before&quot; and &quot;afters&quot; and was flabbergasted! 
Debbie Harry declared of late that she had to do a another face-lift: for business. 

Madonna&#039;s &quot;authentic&quot; photo looks interesting. Its not because, despite the work done, she looks her age, she looks a bit sad. Melancholic, almost vulnerable. 
I love &quot;Ray of Light&quot; too.  I really love that album and the way she looked in these days. Maybe she was really happy back then because she had become a mother? To me that was Madonna at her best, in music and looks.

By the way, why don&#039;t we never talk about men? I would have found the &quot;W&quot; cover with Brad Pitt, as an example, very interesting.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas authenticity isn&#8217;t &#8220;allowed&#8221; anymore. Interesting faces are gone. Is it us the audience who seems not to want authenticity anymore? Is it us who does want only to see beauty fake? Or are we brainwashed by the media? Even a lot off younger big stars are not for real anymore. Most off them have something changed. I&#8217;ve viewed a site with the &#8220;before&#8221; and &#8220;afters&#8221; and was flabbergasted!<br />
Debbie Harry declared of late that she had to do a another face-lift: for business. </p>
<p>Madonna&#8217;s &#8220;authentic&#8221; photo looks interesting. Its not because, despite the work done, she looks her age, she looks a bit sad. Melancholic, almost vulnerable.<br />
I love &#8220;Ray of Light&#8221; too.  I really love that album and the way she looked in these days. Maybe she was really happy back then because she had become a mother? To me that was Madonna at her best, in music and looks.</p>
<p>By the way, why don&#8217;t we never talk about men? I would have found the &#8220;W&#8221; cover with Brad Pitt, as an example, very interesting&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deb hart</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9985</link>
		<dc:creator>deb hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=7569#comment-9985</guid>
		<description>Madoona just can&#039;t get enough of herself, no matter what she does. she has no frame of reference, so no idea what and who she is. 

she has beautiful eyes and could take some nice photos, but what she has done to her body over the last 10 yrs is not pretty, not youthful, dont know what she thinks she is achieving?  her husband said it best, she looks like grissle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madoona just can&#8217;t get enough of herself, no matter what she does. she has no frame of reference, so no idea what and who she is. </p>
<p>she has beautiful eyes and could take some nice photos, but what she has done to her body over the last 10 yrs is not pretty, not youthful, dont know what she thinks she is achieving?  her husband said it best, she looks like grissle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellington</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200901/the-sticky-and-sweet-faces-of-madonna-vs-w-magazine-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=7569#comment-9983</guid>
		<description>Madonna is the best at presenting herself in what ever form she wishes. No one in my mind does this better. Granted she does scary me a bit in these photos. My favourite Madonna is when she was  in her &#039;Ray of Light&#039; phase. She seemed real to me then, and it was a rather good cd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madonna is the best at presenting herself in what ever form she wishes. No one in my mind does this better. Granted she does scary me a bit in these photos. My favourite Madonna is when she was  in her &#8216;Ray of Light&#8217; phase. She seemed real to me then, and it was a rather good cd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

