Comments on: Katie Holmes And Tom Cruise For NYTimes T Magazine

By: Reyna

Reyna — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:15:20 +0000

Katie Holmes has big, ugly features (ugly eyes, ugly lips, ugly skin, ugly nose, ugly posture) and without make-up, hair style and Tom Cruises’s money to buy her designer’s clothes, she is plain ordinary. How funny when she tries to be a fashionista because now she has Tom’s money to cover up her plainness.

By: Adriana

Adriana — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:53:55 +0000

Ellington is right, the photos are taken to promote Tom’s movie Valkerie. Can anyone explain me why Katie has to be photographed too as someone she can’t even play that well?
The actress who plays his wife in Valkerie, Dutch Carice van Houten is a real leading lady, a great actress far better than Katie….but Carice’ part in Valkerie is a supporting actress role……
If you ever get the change to see Paul Verhoeven’s Blackbook don’t hestitate. Verhoeven make two kind of movies, Hollywood slick and great quality Dutch movies. I adore the man…..

Oh yes the Cruises…..even Suri is to me, (sorry!!!) a scary kid from Hubbard’s planet! Ugh!

The black/white photography is very beautiful. I just don’t like the subjects….

Eva, you did add nothing to this discussion than criticize Ellington’s opinion.

By: stella j

stella j — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:20:42 +0000

Eva, I think Ellington answered earlier. I don’t like Tom (or Katie) that much either. But I think as far as this article goes, we can all safely express our opinions without taking one side or the other.
I thought there was something strange about Katie’s hair too, Dolly Bird! This must be it! She’s been photographed last year! or so…

By: Dolly Bird

Dolly Bird — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:42:20 +0000

I’m not a Tom Cruise fan. Never have been but I like Katie Holmes ever since I saw her in Dawson. These pictures are beautiful and I’ve always dreamed of being photographed a la George Hurell like this. These pictures look like they were taken last year as Katie is still growing out her hair from her short crop not too long ago.
And I wish the press would leave Suri alone even if Tom keeps pimping the little darling.

By: Eva

Eva — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:01:51 +0000

You didn’t answer the question.

By: Ellington

Ellington — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:41:57 +0000

Eva, I read everything that Kpriss posts and I express my opinion.
Just be because I have disdain(animosity is too strong a word)for Tom Cruise and his latest wife, does not mean that I have no right to express what I think. Also Kpriss has asked for varied opinions on the matter.
Now you have asked me a question and I have deemed to answer it.
Now I ask a question of you, what do you like about the above photos
(which I said were shot well) and Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes?
If you produce a well thought out argument I may just change my mind.

By: Eva

Eva — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:16:17 +0000

Ellington, you had to click on the link in order to read the story. If you have such animosity, why do you bother?

By: Ellington

Ellington — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:32:28 +0000

Katie Holmes is the type of woman who never appears to be beautiful to me. Sometimes she is “cute” looking and other times she is just beyond ordinary looking, nothing memorable at all. This also includes her acting skills and her striving to be a fashionista.
As for Tom, I CANNOT ABIDE HIM!
The only film, that I liked and it was not because he was in it was “Magnolia” the cast in that was stellar and Tom was not the star.
He is doing this press for his upcoming film “Valkerie” in which he plays a Nazi officer who wants to kill Hitler while sporting a flat Californian accent! The man’s a genius! : P
As for the photos they are well shot, but then they should be.