I miss a serious piece of news about Kate Moss. So here’s her latest perfume’s commercial: Velvet Hour.
Not too bad, not too good either, just perfect for a mass-distributed product like Kate Moss makes them. I sometimes ask myself why a celebrity would choose to cheapen its name and prestige by lending them to a mass produced product (type clothes and/or perfumes, accessories). I can understand the labeling “designer” for the so-called celeb-collections, but even so, if it’s a cheap thing, why even bother? Wouldn’t that make more damage than cash ins?
4 comments
haha, bad acting alert!
I love Kate and after seeing this(bad acting or not) I would be tempted to go out and sniff her new perfume.
Kate’s hanging on to the last few remaining years of her career so doing an ad, damaging or not, if it means $500,000 more in the bank does it really matter what her detractors think. Take the money and run Kate!
Its Kate Moss the money maven!
She is iconic now and can add her name to toilet paper if she chose.
I don’t think its damaging, I mean if that coke mess she was in a few year back didn’t do her in why would her slinging perfume and designing for TopShop do it?
I’ve seen this commercial for a month yet on tv. And indeed it doesn’t make any difference if you watch Kate the Money Maven (LOL at Ellington!) doing perfume of toiletpaper….who cares anyway?
Leave a Comment