Comments on: Tom Ford’s Fur Boots

By: Luv_fashion

Luv_fashion — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 13:56:16 +0000

Live and love fashion, but unfortunately had to strike Tom Ford off my list when I saw his ugly fur boots. Tom, your not being ‘controversial’ for having fur, your just being cruel. If you’ve ever seen how much care an animal puts into their fur it’s amazing. They spend hours grooming themselves – because it’s their fur…It’s not ours! I know Tom has a heart, you can see it when he talks. I think if he watched one of these fur making processes in person (animals smarter than dogs put in small cages, and strangled, drowned, beaten etc..all for a one season wear coat ..), he would take the higher, much more difficult stand, and drop the fur! John Lennon didn’t become famous for following the war – it’s those that go against the grain we remember. Oh well, Stella McCartney turned down a job from him years ago for this reason, and she clearly hasn’t looked back haha (and is much richer)!

By: Kinzy

Kinzy — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:58:06 +0000

I like these, especially since they are real fur. But they are sooo ungodly expensive I wouldn’t dream of having them. And he probably should make a useable fur himself. I do it, and I kill my own deer. It’s too hard for anyone without a brain (and the critters) to do. You kinda need muscles too…

By: seektherapy

seektherapy — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:36:23 +0000

Tom Fords one of a kind, fox terrier, Angus ! If he shipped his fox terrier to china.. Tom Ford needs to experience the process of making of fur, since he wants to use it. I think anyone who buys a fur should be forced to pick out the animal of choice and then forced to watch the animals die for their clothing.
I love how the fashion industry markets these items, calling this “primative”. Perhaps, these people need to take a history lesson. Primative is when people would hunt for their own food and utilize every part of the animal for “survival”.
Fur clothing is bought by ignorant shallow celebrities and wealthy that are extremely “narcissistic”!

By: e.varden

e.varden — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:13:19 +0000

I’ve never seen a product that disgusted me this much. Dead animals melded into hideously ugly “boots”?

For the price of a yearly wage of a Mexican peon?

- I can see dropping 100K for a Porsche, becos it’s a physical beauty, and a spendid road machine. But 4k+ on fugly boots?

You stink, Tom. You are SO creepily disgusting with this offering to the rich and deplorable my fingers are itching to get away from the keyboard.

Ew.

By: Sal

Sal — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:17:13 +0000

Too right. Interesting looking, but utterly impractical.

By: Alex Falcão

Alex Falcão — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:31:18 +0000

Tom Ford shouls use his own fur for those boots… Being ridiculous and promoting fur is sooo old-fashion…

Fur is death!

By: Adriana

Adriana — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:22:29 +0000

Not, its fur!
Not, the price!
Not my world…..

By: Ellington

Ellington — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:56:22 +0000

These boots are not for those who trudge through the snow. They are for those who are driven everywhere even by dog sled. They never walk. The Aspen set.

By: Dolly Bird

Dolly Bird — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:13:54 +0000

Precious ridicule!
I’d add them to my Bonfire of Vanities list.