<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tom Cruise Valkyrie Vs Claus Von Stauffenberg Photoshop Courtesy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylefrizz.com/200806/tom-cruise-varkyrie-vs-claus-von-stauffenberg-photoshop-courtesy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200806/tom-cruise-varkyrie-vs-claus-von-stauffenberg-photoshop-courtesy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michelle</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200806/tom-cruise-varkyrie-vs-claus-von-stauffenberg-photoshop-courtesy/comment-page-1/#comment-3893</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/?p=3185#comment-3893</guid>
		<description>This has bru-haha already been debunked and explained.  Slate has had to admit that &lt;a target=&quot;new&quot; href=&quot;http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b144134_valkyrie_flap_wasnt.html?sid=rss_topstories&amp;utm_source=eonline&amp;utm_medium=rssfeeds&amp;utm_campaign=rss_topstories&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they were wrong&lt;/a&gt; in their accusation and sloppy with their research.

  Basically , they aren&#039;t the same photo .  Slate didn&#039;t do their research to make sure it was the correct photo and made a unfair accusation, and now have egg on their faces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has bru-haha already been debunked and explained.  Slate has had to admit that <a target="new" href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b144134_valkyrie_flap_wasnt.html?sid=rss_topstories&amp;utm_source=eonline&amp;utm_medium=rssfeeds&amp;utm_campaign=rss_topstories" rel="nofollow">they were wrong</a> in their accusation and sloppy with their research.</p>
<p>  Basically , they aren&#8217;t the same photo .  Slate didn&#8217;t do their research to make sure it was the correct photo and made a unfair accusation, and now have egg on their faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

