Comments on: Estée Lauder Turbo Lash Mascara Vs Lancôme Ôscillation Mascara

By: cristina

cristina — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:40 +0000

i’ll go with lauder…i started just putting mascara when i noticed my lower lashes looked longer and thicker. it was also on tv comparing a $350 dollars stuff to make your lashes longer vs. a $32 lauder mascara. and lancome, most of the time copies estee lauder. lauder was the first one to have that vibrating mascara but lancome copied it..

By: Jenlovesestee

Jenlovesestee — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:38:49 +0000

Ok lovelies, Estee Lauder 1)Put’s the mascara together for you before you leave the counter, 2) The formula scientifically is richer, more moisturizing and stays on better than Lancome’s. You need a moisturizing mascara b/c they tend to dry out your eyelashes and make them break off. Also, if you are using any mascara without the proper eyelash primer then you cannot say a word about either mascara b/c you are using it wrong!!!!!

By: Sandy

Sandy — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:34:01 +0000

I purchased the Lancome one and it was cheap looking. I have racoon eyes at the end of the evening and I only used one coat. Not only that I didn’t see the difference in using a non-battery mascara vs. a battery mascara. Not a break through in science for mascara… sorry! I have used better and higher quality mascara.

By: Melisa

Melisa — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:55:44 +0000

I preferr Estee Lauder because I already have the Lancome one and IT BROKE AND DAMAGED my eyelashes. Please don´t buy it because it will represent a real damage to your eyelashes.

By: Kim

Kim — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:07:15 +0000

I purchased the Estee Lauder mascara and it’s completely and utterly rubbish. My cheap Max Factor works much better!

I do love Lancome mascaras, though – I’m quite tempted by their battery one; at least it has a decent brush which the Estee Lauder one definitely does not. Clump city!

Having said all that, though, the very best mascara I have ever come across is Chanel Inimitable.

By: Adriana

Adriana — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:54:16 +0000

Good point Kerry! A very good point……

By: Kerry

Kerry — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:42:27 +0000

Do we really need a gimmicky battery operated mascara brush? Are women getting so feeble that they can’t apply mascara without a power aid? The earth is already groaning, unable to cope with the consumables which we discard. Thanks Estee Lauder for adding more batteries to the toxic mountain which is already degrading the planet.

By: Shaquira

Shaquira — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:35:53 +0000

Defenetly lancome! they are the leaders in mascara. and the Lancome mascara oscillation it so soft you cant hardly feel the vibration vs the estees wich vibrate a bit more also with the lancome you can control the vibrating with estee you cant!

By: danyelle

danyelle — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:05:49 +0000

first of all let me ask you ladies, would you want to have to assemble your mascara before you use it? Not me. If you choose Lauder’s turbo lash mascara you will have to put it together after you buy it. Lancome’s comes already assembled. :)

By: kpriss

kpriss — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:08:10 +0000

Ajent Orange, thank you for bringing back my peace of mind!