<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you Pay $260 to Have Footprints on Your Longchamp Handbag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylefrizz.com/200804/would-you-pay-260-to-have-footprints-on-your-longchamp-handbag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200804/would-you-pay-260-to-have-footprints-on-your-longchamp-handbag/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another Jeremy Scott Pliage Longchamp Bag &#8212; StyleFrizz</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200804/would-you-pay-260-to-have-footprints-on-your-longchamp-handbag/comment-page-1/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Jeremy Scott Pliage Longchamp Bag &#8212; StyleFrizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/200804/would-you-pay-260-to-have-footprints-on-your-longchamp-handbag/#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>[...] mythical Pliage bag is no longer foot-printed but takes the very exclusive print of a gold card (and sells like always chez Colette for $270). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mythical Pliage bag is no longer foot-printed but takes the very exclusive print of a gold card (and sells like always chez Colette for $270). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
