<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: L&#8217;Oréal to Take Over YSL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kpriss</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>kpriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>I think, after all, it&#039;s a matter of names ;) . If the news was more like &quot;x is taking over ysl&quot; and not &quot;l&#039;oreal is taking over ysl&quot; it would have all been reassuring (like in &quot;oh, thank God, Ysl won&#039;t disappear!&quot;).

The problem is not re-locating products after the taking over but mainly de-locating quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, after all, it&#8217;s a matter of names ;) . If the news was more like &#8220;x is taking over ysl&#8221; and not &#8220;l&#8217;oreal is taking over ysl&#8221; it would have all been reassuring (like in &#8220;oh, thank God, Ysl won&#8217;t disappear!&#8221;).</p>
<p>The problem is not re-locating products after the taking over but mainly de-locating quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolo</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>lolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Nearly all luxury brands today are owned by companies who own both cheap and expensive brands. L&#039;Oréal alreday owns Lancôme, Shu Uemura, Biotherm, Kiehl&#039;s, Armani, Viktor &amp; Rolf and I don&#039;t really see how YSL is any different from them. You&#039;ll never find YSL products where you find L&#039;Oréal products!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly all luxury brands today are owned by companies who own both cheap and expensive brands. L&#8217;Oréal alreday owns Lancôme, Shu Uemura, Biotherm, Kiehl&#8217;s, Armani, Viktor &amp; Rolf and I don&#8217;t really see how YSL is any different from them. You&#8217;ll never find YSL products where you find L&#8217;Oréal products!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana Josina</title>
		<link>http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana Josina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stylefrizz.com/200801/loreal-to-take-over-ysl/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>For years now YSL&#039;s Touche Éclat is almost my best friend. Always there to &quot;safe me&quot;.  And just like you our dear editor Kpriss I felt a kind of &quot;betrayed&quot; that it may become a L&#039;Oréal product. Though they have some good products. 

The curse of globalisation is a threat for all that once was exclusive and therefore made us feel special. That&#039;s gone now.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years now YSL&#8217;s Touche Éclat is almost my best friend. Always there to &#8220;safe me&#8221;.  And just like you our dear editor Kpriss I felt a kind of &#8220;betrayed&#8221; that it may become a L&#8217;Oréal product. Though they have some good products. </p>
<p>The curse of globalisation is a threat for all that once was exclusive and therefore made us feel special. That&#8217;s gone now&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

